RC Slope Soaring in Hong Kong

A forum for rc sailplane pilots
It is currently Fri Nov 06, 2026 2:27 am

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:32 pm 

Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:29 am
Posts: 2
一名42歲的農婦正在田地里干活,突然一架模型飛機墜落,朝她斜飛過來,“飛機”的螺旋槳把農婦的腰部撞開拳頭大的一個洞,農婦當場死亡。“飛機”的主人稱這是一次意外事故,因為模型飛機的遙控器失控了. . . .
http://www.backchina.com/news/2006-04-13/86972.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 媒体的报道
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:24 am 

Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 24
Image
Image生活新报“新闻110”3110110消息: 模型飞机撞死人,你也许不信,但昨日昆明龙头街就上演了真实的一幕:一名42岁的农妇正在田地里干活,突然一架模型飞机坠落,朝她斜飞过来,“飞机”的螺旋桨把农妇的腰部撞开拳头大的一个洞,农妇当场死亡。“飞机”的主人称这是一次意外事故,因为模型飞机的遥控器失控了。
  意外:模型飞机撞死干活农妇



  “哎哟!”昨日9时左右,昆明龙头街麦地村的村民吴琼仙与父亲苏先生和母亲吴女士一块到村庄西边的包产田地里收拾蚕豆,苏先生老俩口负责从田里抱已经割倒晒干的蚕豆杆到田的一角捶打,吴琼仙则背着一个箩筐在田里捡拾散落在田地里的蚕豆粒。同村的朱江是个模型飞机爱好者,看着昨日的晴朗天气也雅兴倍增,带着一名学徒到距离吴琼仙干活的田地150米外的一块空地里训练放“飞机”。“啪嗒!啪嗒”的模型飞机声音虽然有些吵,但吴琼仙和父母却无权干涉,因为朱江并没有在自己家的田地里放“飞机”。9时50分左右,灾难却突然降临了,只听女儿吴琼仙“哎哟!”叫了一声就倒在地上了,身边有一架解体的模型飞机。苏先生和老伴赶到女儿身边发现,女儿吴琼仙已经死亡了。几分钟后,放“飞机”的朱江和一名学徒也赶到现场,看到睡在地上的吴琼仙,朱江惊呆了,只见他立即用手探了探吴琼仙的鼻孔,然后又扒开吴琼仙的双眼看了看,摇摇头瘫坐在地上。现场哭声顿起,空气“凝固”成一片凄凉,憋得在场的人都泪水溢满眼眶。村里的村民们循声赶来,并立即拨打110报了警,几分钟后,龙头街派出所的民警赶到现场,立即在死者周围拉起警戒线调查。
  问责:“飞机”主人延误抢救?
  “我报过120了,但我当时就发现她已死了。”记者昨日11时许闻讯赶到现场,警察正在对吴琼仙的尸体进行查验。死者的父亲苏先生告诉记者,女儿的死是被延误抢救造成的,因为事发后,他就朝放模型飞机的朱江大喊,但朱江“磨蹭”了一阵才过来,到现场后,他要求朱江拨打120报警救人,但朱江告诉他已经报过警了,事后120救护车却一直未到现场。朱江则告诉记者,他在事发后的确拨打过120,但没打通。后他查看吴琼仙发现吴已经死亡了,所以就没有再次拨打120。“吴琼仙的所有家属都怪罪我,说我没报警,我很冤枉的,我也不愿发生这样的事啊!”朱江一脸委屈。在现场,死者的家属不停地埋怨、指责,朱江只好忍气吞声,因为他知道吴琼仙的死自己有责任。
  讲述:“飞机”遥控器失控惹祸
  记者昨日在现场看到,模型飞机的机身长有1米多,还有两个“翅膀”,都是用很薄的层板和纸板做成的,“飞机”坠落后已经解体成几截,散落在死者的尸体周围,死者的右边腰部有一个拳头大的洞,鲜血已染红半个身子。死者的父亲苏先生告诉记者,当时模型飞机突然由北向南斜掉下来,吴琼仙就是被模型飞机的螺旋桨撞到右边腰部死亡的。模型飞机为何会突然坠落呢?“飞机”的主人朱江解释说,“飞机”坠落只可能有两种情况,一是“飞机”的构件突然脱落,二是模型飞机的遥控器突然失控,“飞机”失去控制。他前晚给这架“飞机”充电时曾检查过,“飞机”本身没有没有任何问题,在“飞机”出事时他和学徒都在操纵遥控器,当时他发现遥控器失控了,他连续按了几下遥控器都没有控制住“飞机”坠落,所以他认为这次“飞机”撞死人应该是遥控器失控造成的。
  处理:先处理尸体后协商解决
  在现场,死者的家属看守着“飞机”的主人朱江,要求朱江当场表态,怎样处理这件事,朱江却只有等待警察处理。当事双方一直在现场争执,直到昨日13时,警察做完死者吴琼仙的尸体检验后,把当事双方叫到一起,经过协商,最后决定先通知殡仪馆的工作人员把死者的尸体运离现场,然后再协商其他善后问题。朱江当场找亲属凑齐运尸体的费用,把死者尸体运走,然后当事双方被龙头街派出所的民警带回派出所作进一步调查,现场的围观人群才逐渐离开现场。记者在现场看到,死者家属和“飞机”主人朱江面对突然发生的这件事,都不知道该如何处理,不过当事双方都很冷静,双方都表示他们愿意由警察解决这件事,现场并没有提出赔偿和追究责任等问题。
  律师:“飞机”主人不是故意伤人
  “飞机”撞死人,“飞机”的主人要承担哪些责任?这种行为要负法律责任吗?记者昨日针对此事咨询云南国平律师事务所的律师陈平。陈律师告诉记者,因为模型飞机撞死人已成事实,但并不是“飞机”的主人故意想用模型飞机撞人,“飞机”的主人也没有意料到“飞机”会出事,所以“飞机”的主人虽然不是故意伤人,但已造成过失伤害。“飞机”的主人应该承担死者的安葬费,并通过协商适当对死者家属作出赔偿。至于“飞机”的主人是否承担刑事责任,要等公安机关调查认定后做出结论。
  重庆小伙惹祸
  昆明师傅担责
  “智者千虑,必有一失。”模型飞机撞死人后,记者对“飞机”的主人进行调查发现,这名“飞机”主人朱江因为从小爱好玩模型飞机,已经玩弄这种模型飞机40多年了,虽然曾经也发生过“飞机”坠落的事,但模型飞机撞死人,他也是第一次遇上。虽然有师傅在一起指导,但昨日操纵这架出事“飞机”的是一名第一天参加模型飞机训练的重庆小伙。
  调查:学徒第一天训练就出事
  朱江告诉记者,昨日8时许,他带着最近来学习玩模型飞机的重庆小伙,一个20岁左右的刘姓青年到麦地村西边的田野中,准备教这名学徒实地训练,由于要现场安装“飞机”,他们9时左右才开始放飞,先放飞的是一种叫做“飞艇”的“大飞机”,后发现昨日风很大,担心“大飞机”惹祸,所以他们改用出事的这种遥控模型飞机放飞,因为这种遥控飞机体积小些,他们一直都放飞得很开心,这架“飞机”在空中来回飞了10多个来回后,却突然因为遥控器失控出事了。据朱江介绍,这架出事的“飞机”重2.5公斤左右,机身长1米多,是他五六年前从河南花600多元钱买回来的,这种“飞机”能腾空150--200米高。昨日跟他一起来训练“飞机”的刘姓小伙曾在电脑上学习过10多个小时,昨日是第一次出来进行实地训练,当时虽然操纵这架“飞机”的是这名学徒,但他也帮忙操纵着。
  自信:玩模型飞机40年未出事
  朱江告诉记者,他除了会“驾驶”模型飞机,还会自己制造这种模型飞机,出售给喜欢模型飞机的人,他玩的模型飞机分两种,一种是“飞艇”,另一种就是昨日出事的这种遥控“飞机”。“飞艇”不仅体积大,腾空能力也很高,能腾空1000多米高,当然造价也要2000多元,由于“飞艇”体积大,所以他平时都选择在小屯附近的一块空地上放飞,很少在村庄附近放飞。他偶尔在村庄附近放飞的都是遥控“飞机”。因为从小就喜欢玩模型飞机,朱江玩“飞艇”的历史已有40多年,“驾驶”遥控“飞机”也有30多年了,还吸引了大批模型飞机爱好者,到目前为止,他已经收过几十名来自四面八方的徒弟了,虽然曾经也发生过几次“飞机”坠落的事,但都是“飞机”被砸烂,并没有伤及过人。
  旁证:“飞机”经常在村庄周围坠落
  朱江是麦地村出了名的模型飞机爱好者,所以平时总有村民到他家观看他制造的“飞机”,有时还有村民追随他一起到野外放“飞机”,大家一起同喜同乐。但昨日“飞机”撞死人后,大家对他的看法就不一样了,埋怨声、指责声、叫骂声不绝于耳。“老朱啊!早就跟你打招呼了,不要在村庄附近放,这不,出事了嘛?”村民告诉记者,朱江经常一个人或带着学徒到村庄外的田野中来训练“飞机”,曾多次发生“飞机”坠落到田地里的事,许多次“飞机”还摔得支离破碎,但朱江痴心不改,村民们有时虽然觉得他这样会伤害到庄稼,但因为都是一个村庄的人,所以大家除了偶尔劝说一下朱江,并没有阻止朱江。朱江面对村民的评说和指责,除了无奈地摇摇头,只有沉默。
  管理:玩模型飞机要培训
  “个人玩这种模型飞机需要办理什么手续吗?”朱江告诉记者,“驾驶”模型飞机是要经过有关部门培训,取得相关手续才可以进行的,他曾在几年前就参加过培训了,当记者要求见一下他的相关手续时,朱江却称因为平时都不用,所以暂时不知道放到哪儿去了。不过,朱江告诉记者,他制造“模型飞机”从来都没有办理过什么手续,也没有人来管过他,他的学徒们也没有参加过任何培训。记者昨日联系相关部门了解到,从事航空体育运动的飞行驾驶人员,必须经过系统的航空理论和驾驶技术培训,并按照民用航空器飞行入员执照制度的规定,向民航局申请办理各种航空器的驾驶员执照。另外,航空场地和跑道的要求也必须符合相关部门的规定和要求。
  后悔:不该在村庄附近放“飞机”
  “对不起了,大哥大姐!我愿意承担一切责任。”朱江在现场不停地向死者家属鞠躬道歉,死者家属虽然理解,但失去亲人的悲痛,让所有家属除了抱怨,已没有其他更好的发泄办法。朱江告诉记者,他过去只想着在村庄附近的这片田野放“飞机”方便,忽视了村庄周围随时都可能有村民出现的情况,以后他一定不在村庄附近放“飞机”了。“吴琼仙的死,我有责任,我一定承担一切责任。”朱江说,死者家属不管怎样埋怨和骂他都能接受,因为是他的疏忽,“飞机”才撞到人的,他会承担一切责任,积极配合警方处理好善后事宜。
  首席记者 段国强 实习记者 张翔 文 记者 晏蓬 图


]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:13 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 3739
Location: Hong Kong
聞者傷心、見者流淚!慘!一條人命無姑姑的斷送了。
希望各位以後玩油機的朋友小心


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 6:44 pm 

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:57 pm
Posts: 688
Dear power plan pilot :
Please don't fly engine plan in clear water bay,
You and me are !!!!!!!!!!!!(LUCKY)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 741
Location: 沙田
Image

個 spinner 同 engine 血跡班班﹐我腦海出現既景像係急救人員絕望地將死者既腸臟由螺旋槳解番出黎﹐真係令人心寒。我都無去清水灣好耐囉﹐果度好多圍觀既人都唔係玩模型飛機﹐唔知危險﹐警覺性就自然低﹐有事時未必可以及時反應避開。清水灣既秩序本來就已經差﹐週不時都有滑翔機撞到人或車﹐好彩咁耐都未試過大鑊野﹐如果係油機﹐後果真係諗都唔敢諗


Last edited by Y C Lui on Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 9:23 pm
Posts: 93
記得細個時,上水鳳溪中學附近好像有單 powered 機撞到個女農民變「血人」的意外。


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 5:31 pm
Posts: 741
Location: 沙田
講起我就記得 Willy 你好似係清水灣俾飛機撞穿頭﹐要叫十字車﹐仲賣埋報紙。


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 3739
Location: Hong Kong
Y C Lui wrote:
講起我就記得 Willy 你好似係清水灣俾飛機撞穿頭﹐要叫十字車﹐仲賣埋報紙。


Willy 個日


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:06 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 93
Dear Stanley,

如果我冇記錯,你若干年前飛glider時係有佩戴地盤安全帽,是嗎?

(首次試用中文系統)

Philip Shum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 3739
Location: Hong Kong
?鬺r!有相為証
http://www.rcsail.com/pilot20.jpg

我依家少去清水灣所以都好耐無帶啦。自從幾年前有一次比人隻機(好彩?蠜PP)撞倒個肚後
都覺得頂安全帽唔夠用,但唔知還有什麼防被撞的好方法! :x 唯有少去人多的?囍a方,依家清水灣咁多超速油機,咪話唔驚! :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:24 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:34 am
Posts: 309
[quote="Stanley"]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:08 am 

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 93
[quote="Stanley"]


Last edited by PhilipShum on Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:38 am 

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 93
BigYeung wrote:
.......Safety is the most important. Never attempt anything which is hazardous to the surroundings (people & objects); Never over-estimate one's own ability. One can do well but the machine may fail! Get some safety margin before it's too late. Please!
Some safety margins may be:
Flying with good & safety sense, careful selection of reliable equipment, proper site to do the event, proper testing on non-questionable operation before flights AND just to repeat the warning from manufacturers/suppliers again - RC model is NOT a toy!


Dear Big Yeung,

Truly, in deed.

2. Even a Great Grand 'Master' can not control frequency jamming.

3. On the 15th April, 2006 at Cheung Kwun O, I witnessed an R/C Helicopter lost control. It was flying inverted at full throttle, suddently lost control, hit a tree on the road side and fall between cars (all belongs to model lovers) and pilots. It was most fortunate no one was hurt.

4. Post-mortem revealed that it was not pilot error.

5. Why?

6. About ten minutes after the incident, we spot an r/c fixed wing flying on the hill side at Cheung Kwun O. The involved r/c heli pilot suspected that it might be that fixed wing causing r/c frequency jamming. So he took out a frequency scanner, but to his dismay, the flying r/c fixed wing was not on his channel.

7. However, a few minutes later, all of a sudden, nearly all lights on the 72MHz frequency scanner were brightly on ! It seems that the whole spectrum on 72 MHz was jammed ?!

8. So, Masters be aware.

Philip Shum


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:15 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:34 am
Posts: 309
Philip,
It's true. Yesterday (16Apr2006) by noon, I tried to use my 72Mhz freq. scanner to determine any available frequency slot. Surprisingly, about 70% of the 10 to 60 channels were in use. It was amazing that most red LED were on. Initially, I thought it might be the pulse when I switched on the device. I switched the scanner off and on again. It was still telling the frequencies were being used. At that moment, there were about 40 RC car drivers on the track and I didn't think they were all 72Mhz with the transmitters on. 72Mhz is not so popular in HK for RC cars. There might be something strange at that moment.
Even dual conversion & PCM will not help for such a prolonged interference. With PCM or equivalent function, the damage could be reduced, e.g. setting for throttle idle or cut for fail-safe, flap/butterfly-on or full spin to reduce the running speed...etc.
These may be some measures that can help for minimizing the damage in case of an accident.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:00 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 93
BigYeung wrote:
.....It's true. Yesterday (16Apr2006) by noon, I tried to use my 72Mhz freq. scanner to determine any available frequency slot. Surprisingly, about 70% of the 10 to 60 channels were in use. It was amazing that most red LED were on....... At that moment, there were about 40 RC car drivers on the track and I didn't think they were all 72Mhz with the transmitters on. 72Mhz is not so popular in HK for RC cars. There might be something strange at that moment.
Even dual conversion & PCM will not help for such a prolonged interference. With PCM or equivalent function, the damage could be reduced, e.g. setting for throttle idle or cut for fail-safe, flap/butterfly-on or full spin to reduce the running speed...etc.
These may be some measures that can help for minimizing the damage in case of an accident.


Dear Big Yeung,

Where did you conduct your scanning on 16th April, 2006 ?

By the way, the closest frequency to 72MHz on r/c cars are 75MHz. But there was no r/c car tracks near Cheung Kwun O ?

Philip Shum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:32 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:34 am
Posts: 309
At the new RC track in Sa Po, Yuen Long.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:42 pm 

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:53 am
Posts: 2
小心!小心!安全第一.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

RASAIL Home

WindGURU at Ma On Shan, Clearwater Bay and Fei Ngo Shan

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group