Billy wrote:
Willy Lim wrote:
其實該2位人士,向 OFTA、警方俾口供未?
未的話,及若他們萬一要錄取口供而期間又需要律師陪同及提點,我樂意義務陪同他們出席。請代轉達。
To Willy,
剛才同2位不幸者通過電話,他們於8月頭才比口供,他們渴求有律師陪同及提點,但驚唔好意思;
他們會出值我們的特別會議提供資料,或者到時再傾。多謝您的協助。
Billy.
It is doubtful if the transmitters somehow related to the 2 arrested persons have genuinely caused the interference leading to the complaint that OFTA attended to on 14.7.04. It was possible that there were other interfering sources of radio or non-radio nature, or interfering frequencies generated and emitted by other apparatus of other parties. It was also possible that the equipment allegedly interfered had defects or maintenance problems rendering it susceptible to interference not happening under normal situation, in particular if the equipment operated in digital mode.
If OFTA cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that the transmitters related to the 2 arrested persons were the only sources that caused genuine interference at real time during her locating of the sources on 14.7.04, she had just caught 2 scapegoats only. If that is the case, she should follow her policy of not taking action for cases not related to complaint by instituting no prosecution.
In fact, the arrest related to 2 different but close frequencies has indicated the doubt of what actually caused the interference. The case is quite similar to a photo of speeding detected by radar showing 2 vehicles for which the police cannot prosecute any driver.
The 2 arrested persons, being possible victims of the case, may consider to take their legal right to remain silent when asked for statements under caution because any confession would complicate the situation in a negative way.
Of course, OFTA might consider prosecution without connecting to the complaint against her policy, which would qualify Ombudsman's investigation for mal-administration. The implication would also very likely arouse follow-up actions from radio equipment importers, dealers and users later.
Not just for the 2 arrested persons but also the interest of all its members and local RC hobbyists, HKRCSS may wish to communicate with OFTA further, and seek legal and professional advice for the doubts raised above.
XR